fep

FEP website now displays the number of implementations for each implementable proposal:

Recently, there was a discussion about generic #ActivityPub servers. Several people claimed that they were working on one, but it turned out that their "generic" servers only support activities defined in the ActivityPub specification. Such a server shouldn't be called generic. It is not difficult to build, neither it is an interesting concept because competing protocols (e.g. Nostr) already offer much more.

NodeBB federates out Note or Article depending on the length of the content. While this by-and-large works, the article logic does not encourage as much discussion as expected because a summary is generated so as to provide something for microblog-style software to show (otherwise, it would only show the title (name) and a URL to the forum.)

Hey @fentiger@zotum.net, I was debugging something @thisismissem sent me a couple days back, and in the process of doing so discovered that Zotum.net serves context with activities!

Threaded applications often have the need to move and remove content between groups/communities for curation purposes (i.e. resolving miscategorization, spam, etc.)

FEP-0151: NodeInfo in Fediverse Software (2025 edition)